In two choices, one is honest
It was not a debate. One prepared to debate policies. The other did not. The other shamelessly attacked with lies and misinformation, as much as 50 lies according to some accounts. There was no fact checking. The moderators only asked questions. There was no accountability. The debater was immediately on the defensive. Should he counter the lies and the misinformation or proceed with policies? He tried doing both and did so very poorly. It was difficult to watch. He should have been prepared for the onslaught because this is the attacker’s style. The attacker had no intention ...