In the end we think the naming ordinance approved by the Warren City Council, and recommended by the city Planning Commission, is a good ordinance.

The ordinance creates a standardized application and review process for future naming requests involving city-owned parks, facilities, structures and infrastructure. City Council member Maurice Cashman suggested an amendment prohibiting the renaming of streets and alleyways while still allowing honorary dedications, such as commemorative signs or plaques. Under the revised language, streets and alleyways may receive honorary dedications, but their official names cannot be changed.

Naming applications may be submitted by city residents, property owners and community organizations located within the city. Applicants must submit a fee to cover administrative and advertising costs, along with petitions containing at least 100 signatures from Warren residents or property owners supporting the request. The ordinance also requires applicants to demonstrate a meaningful connection between the proposed name and the city.

The Planning Commission will first review requests, with park-related proposals also requiring input from the Parks, Recreation and Landscape Commission. Public hearings and comment periods will also be required before final consideration by City Council.

The way we name things like buildings, parks and other city infrastructure becomes a part of Warren’s living history. We should be able to articulate a good reason why something is named the way it is. Ideally, we should have enough knowledge of the city’s history to be able to explain to children the story behind names like Struthers, the Wetmore House, the Jefferson Tea House, or why the Myron Waters house on Third Avenue or the Conewango Club on Market Street are important to the city’s history.

We also recognize that we’re running out of things to name. We have to make those opportunities count – and the Planning Commission and City Council ordinance accomplishes that goal.