Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | All Access e-Edition | Home RSS

Our opinion: Shrinking the legislature

March 7, 2013

Just because a proposal makes a lot of sense doesn’t mean it will be successful. In fact, for some ideas in that category, the simple sensibility of the thing dooms it to failure....

« Back to Article

sort: oldest | newest




Mar-08-13 10:58 AM

The ultimate way to do this -- and fix a lot of other things wrong with Pennsylvania -- is through a Constitutional convention that could say "In six years, these are the legislative districts." That way, the size of the legislature would be just one of a bunch of changes; it's always easier to enact something like this as part of a package.

1 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Mar-07-13 12:12 PM

It no doubt would not make much difference as Phil.and Pittsburgh control the state

1 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Mar-07-13 10:57 AM

I agree?

0 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Mar-07-13 9:28 AM

Cue up Kathy's shrill emotional response that every single legislative seat is needed. If not, then who would walk the parade route handing out campaign literature and pencils? Both parties are equally guilty here. The PA Legislature is just a jobs program for the politically connected. It's a disgraceful waste of money. Both houses should be cut in half immediately.

6 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Showing 4 of 4 comments

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
Remember my email address.


I am looking for:
News, Blogs & Events Web