OCCUPY WALL STREET

I believe he'd fit right in.

"Another good day in the "other" world yesterday." If they are having so many good days, maybe you should consider moving there.

Another good day in the "other" world yesterday, one more tyrant down and many more to go, but at least we are scoring. Must be*****to be against reality. . .

badboy, I don't believe you even know the meaning of "slavery". At least I don't fall for made up material. . .or should I say BS. . .

"GBeck9, all they have to do is a little research and they will find the morons that approved those shady home loans as well." Yep, the whole thing *****, can't argue with that! The whole system is wrong, "corporate greed" pays to get their way, it isn't right no matter who is getting paid. I never said any different. OWS is not about politics, at least as far as which side *****, but more about what is right!

George Soros, you knew he was bankrolling the OWS, you even knew it before the story broke. . . Oh yeah, that wasn't a true story was it? Might go as far as saying it was an outright lie. . .

badboy, I don't believe you even know the meaning of "slavery". Like you knew the meaning of your earlier posts that you had based on lies--ha, ha, ha. . . You people crack me up!

GBeck9, all they have to do is a little research and they will find the morons that approved those shady home loans as well. badboy, not a fan of 999. It would raise my sales tax to 17.75%

Oelwyn--look how many people who are against the unions now and where this started--Republicans--their mission, if accepted, is to make ALL working class people work for less! Slavery would fit their needs very well. . .

TOTALLY different message from the tea party--the tea party is only a pac for the republicans--nothing less!

It was directly caused by the Wall Street/bankers--Washington is the political hub, but Wall Street is the financial hub, thus the reason for picking Wall Street over DC. Yes--ALL POLITICIANS are to blame--the system is set up for the money to call all the shots--CORPORATE GREED!

Same message as the Tea-party, just with more violence. Here's some home work for you, check which banks got a bail out, and what company's got money from the Stimulus. Compare that with Obama's campaign contribution. THAT is what need to change, for ALL politicians. Walk on the Government, not wall-street.

We are engaged 'militarily' in over 100 countries in the world.Riots occur at peaceful protests when provoked by police or FBI agitators.Kind of like the "REICHSTAG" fire.The 1% of the Oligarchy(people too rich for a FLAG)will love it if their protection is forthcoming from the Defense Budget.Soon we will hear the Republican Party had to destroy the economy to save it from the Unions-the Middle class-students and other unemployed scum.If only Obama wasn't so uppity..

To my knowledge we our not at was with Gadhafi. . . But I still think tyrants need someone to step up and not let them run all over their people--sort of like the UN.

And, by the sounds of your posts, do you think people like Gadhafi should be free to do as they please?

Right is right, wrong is wrong no matter what some people think. Do you really believe people will go as far as riots because of absolutely no reason?

"Violence in Rome, violence in Egypt, violence in Libya, violence in London. badboy, violent protests have been occurring all around the world for months".--Only trouble with your point of view is OCCUPY WALL STREET hasn't been around for months, so to try and connect OWS and the voilence, oh lets just say against tyrants of the world, doesn't hold water! What does Gadhafi have to do with corporate greed? Or maybe you are saying the world is finally sick of being stepped on and slowly being forced into slavery. . .

Yep, just what we need, a George Soros-funded event in which many of the "participants" are being paid to be there--Straight up lie, thanks to your buddy Rush. . . Don't believe everything you read, especially when it comes from Fox and fiends. . . And no, fiends is not misspelled. . .

"Say what you want about Fox, but it was REUTERS that broke the Soros story for those who couldn't have figured it out beforehand". And I suppose you had if all figured out beforehand?

The Atlantic Wire | Quote and Comment | Huffington Post | Reuters A Reuters story about Occupy Wall Street is drawing widespread criticism — first for its unsubstantiated attempt to connect liberal billionaire George Soros to the protests, then for a lack of transparency as it was corrected. As it became clear that the original story relied on unsourced speculation, indirect financial ties and baseless assertions by Rush Limbaugh, Reuters reversed course. The difference in the stories is captured in the headlines: