Our opinion: Weighing the cost
Predictions that the health care bill passed Saturday by the House of Representatives would, if enacted, cost far more than current estimates were not based solely on experience with federal programs. That would be enough to draw the conclusion, of course; government programs, particularly those involving health care, have cost taxpayers far more than claimed when the programs were established.
But in the case of the House health care bill, there is no doubt about cost overruns. That is because the bill's language includes several programs with costs left open.
According to a published report, more than two dozen aspects of the health care plan are listed at funding for "such sums as may be necessary." That could send the bill's cost skyrocketing far beyond the initial estimates, which themselves have been vague. They range from $900 billion to $1.2 trillion over 10 years.
It has been pointed out that the "such sums as may be necessary" strategy is common in Congress, used by both Democrats and Republicans for all sorts of government programs. No wonder the federal deficit keeps climbing, even as lawmakers and presidents insist that it must be gotten under control.
In a program as massive as that contained in the health care proposal, unspecified costs no doubt will be enormous. Who knows how many billions - or hundreds of billions - of dollars they would add to the program's cost?
That is reason enough for the Senate to reject the House health care bill.
|
Morrison
|
|
|---|---|
|
11-19-09 5:36 PM
|
writer10-exactly. Think of the huge influx of people stacking up doctor visits looking for disability so they can really cash in on being too fat to work to take care of their 5 illegitimatte kids. You won't find a place to sit and wait with the benches full of sleeping giants.
|
|
justobserving
|
|
|
11-19-09 2:31 PM
|
I normally don't comment on this issue because whatever happens is going to be rammed down our throats anyhow, with the middle class stuck paying for it. Look at social security and see what a government run anything becomes.Oh, and Malachy, do you want to get the government involved every time the price of gas goes up or don't you own a car?
|
|
writer10
|
|
|
11-19-09 12:32 PM
|
Here is some economics for everyone to think about. Everyone thinks this bill will cause health care to become cheaper. How ever taxes will go up to cover this and, here is the economics part, if more people have access to health care and we have the same number of doctors, wouldn't this cause rates to go up. Doctors in Warren already cost more than other areas, why, because there aren't enough here to serve the population. Now you throw in a few thousand more, what will happen. I already can't get into a doctor in Warren they are all booked. Good thing I qualified for the VA or I'd be screwed. More people + no increase in number of doctors = inflation based on supply and demand. Think about it.
|
|
Malachy
|
|
|
11-19-09 10:11 AM
|
Once calling myself a donservative and Republican, I am just embarrassed at the predictability of this paper and its hired guns. WHY DO YOU NOT RANT THIS WAY ABOUT SPENDING ON ARMAMENTS? And, all Republicans have done from the outset is try to sabatage getting descent health care for our country. We are about 20th or worse in providing health care to all of our people. Even Cuba betters us. (Hear that all you Mc Cathy/Nixons seeing Commies in the wood pile?) Boring. Lefty is right. I just got my annual letter from my Blue Cross/Shield Insurance Company that my premium is raised again. Surpise. This paper is shamefully carrying water for the Big insurance companies and their agents around your county. Why do they fear a public option so much. Could it have anything to do with their financial rape of we the sheep all these years. But, what the heck, any of us can just buy a newspaper like these jerks and spew our own prejudices.
|
|
fivealive
|
|
|
11-19-09 9:09 AM
|
When my husband and I do our annual budget next month, I think I will suggest we use the phrase "such sums as may be necessary". Maybe we can 'afford' that cruise after all!
|
|
danyay
|
|
|
11-19-09 8:05 AM
|
Once again, I make the argument: If it's broke, do you fix it, or do you throw it all out and start from a failed plan of socialism? The common mantra uttered like the commenter below is: "we're going broke," uninsured, or whatnot. I don't disagree. Let's reform it based on the principles that made the United States great. Not the principles that befell the Soviet Union.
|
|
LeftyBeaulieu
|
|
|
11-19-09 2:00 AM
|
Why? We're going broke paying for hospital and doctor bills.
|






