Neighbors upset with plans for group home
Say structureviolates zoningBy STEPHANIE HAMM shamm@timesobserver.com
Some neighboring Russell residents are angry over the proposed community home being built on Pine Grove Boulevard by Lakeshore Community Services, Inc.
During a public meeting at Russell Fire Hall, they contended that the proposed home is contrary to Pine Grove Township's zoning ordinance.
"We bought that piece of property because it was a really nice piece of property," said Richard Ruedy, chief executive officer with Lakeshore Community Services, Inc. of Erie. "What we try to do is to find a good place for folks to live and have a nice home for them to live in."
Lakeshore Community Services, Inc. was established in 1986 to provide residential care for persons with mental retardation. The agency has since expanded its efforts to include support for persons with serious and persistent mental illness. The agency currently has 30 facilities throughout Erie, Warren, Cameron, Elk, McKean, Clearfield and Jefferson counties.
Two mentally challenged adults will reside in a four-bedroom, two-bathroom home at 7 Pine Grove Blvd. in Russell.
Currently, the two individuals who will be moving into the community home are living alone, and "to bring a couple folks in made a whole lot more sense than to have them out there by themselves," said Ruedy.
According to Ruedy, the individuals will be monitored during all hours of the day, seven days a week. There will be two staff members present during the day, one for each resident, and one staff member will be present during the overnight hours.
Residents in close proximity to the community home lot are not pleased.
"Our problem is, we live in an R1 neighborhood, which says single family dwellings, and we have a group trying to build a duplex in our neighborhood, which is not allowable in our neighborhood," said Bob Bablak, who lives at 14 Pine Grove Blvd., kitty corner to where the lot is.
An R1 district is classified as "single family residential," said Gary Snook, zoning officer for Warren County.
However, from a structural standpoint, the home is not a duplex, he said.
"In order to have a duplex, both dwelling units have to be separated," said Snook. "These are not."
"The one on the right hand side of the house has to go through the left hand portion of the house to get to the other side," explained Snook, referring to how the residents would enter the home from the garage.
The building permit has been issued and the zoning permit has been issued, but the zoning permit has since been appealed, said Snook.
According to Snook, all that can currently be done on the lot it site work.
The process will be on hold until the Warren County Zoning Hearing Board meets to discuss the matter. No date has been set for that meeting.
Ruedy is optimistic that the community home will be up and running sooner rather than later.
"We would hope to have it completed in the next few months," he said.
|
Bailey
|
|
|---|---|
|
01-28-09 5:28 AM
|
I think you are a tad confused on my comment utherjorge. I would have no problem with a home like this. BUT this same issue came up in Oil City. These were NURSING STUDENTS. It's not what the issues are with the residents, but what the laws on the books say is a single family dwelling. Same thing here. Different families, or single people do NOT classify as a single family. Say you have a house next to you in a single family dwelling zone...4 families move in, so it still looks like a single family dwelling, it is? No. You follow what I am saying? Not the QUALITY of the people, it's the QUANTITY. Everyone should have decent housing, no mater what their mental, physical, or class status is. So before you start throwing shamefull towards me, might want to read what I wrote again.
|
|
LSfromErie
|
|
|
01-16-09 1:49 PM
|
I have lived in 2 different homes where there were group homes with NO negative incidents. It was a great way for me to have the opportunity to talk to my young son about people's differences & similarities & how to treat everyone the way you would like to be treated with love & respect. Open your heart & your mind & you will be more open to receive as well.
|
|
Sunshine023
|
|
|
01-15-09 9:11 PM
|
I am gonna go off the deep end here and really flip you folks out! What is a BLACK family moved in!??? With 5 kids? Eh?? lol
|
|
Scrybe
|
|
|
01-15-09 4:35 PM
|
What if a pagan - you know > a real witch > moved into your neighborhood. Would they be accepted? Be careful though, there really is much more of them than you know.
|
|
Sunshine023
|
|
|
01-15-09 10:59 AM
|
The more I think about this, the more is just ******me off. Those "mentally challenged adults" make better neighbors than the 2-faced, hob knob with the snob, nosey neighbors. Amazing how shallow some people are.
|
|
Sunshine023
|
|
|
01-15-09 10:55 AM
|
Small town mentality. Maybe somebody ought to move in with about 6 kids and have 4 of them be underage felons. Would that be better? Shame on those Russell residents. God only knows that will be brought to them in years down the road. Maybe hadicapped children or grandchildren. Won't they think differently then!
|
|
jaycee
|
|
|
01-15-09 10:31 AM
|
VERRRYY INTERESTING!!! It's fine to have a medical office and facility in this "high income neighborhood" with it's R-1 designation but when it's mentally challenged people it violates the zoning. I also think the remark about "friendly, small-town Russell" is less than appropo here...it's not "friendly, small-town Russell" complaining as much as the "snooty high rent district NIMBY's" living in the "ivory towers" in the development. One more thing...a "couple" isn't "two individuals from two different families living together"? I wouldn't want to reside with my sister as a "couple" and my wife certainly isn't a member of my "family"... Isn't "semantics" fun???
|
|
fivealive
|
|
|
01-15-09 9:26 AM
|
I'm betting if this were two elderly individuals who needed live-in care there would be no issue. If you are going to oppose the group home, at least be honest with yourselves and others about the reason. You might also want to volunteer with the mentally challenged so that you have some idea what you are talking about. So much for friendly, small-town Russell.
|
|
BillsWife
|
|
|
01-15-09 8:29 AM
|
So, according to Bailey, ONE family is not 2 individuals from different families.. does this mean a "boyfriend & girlfriend" couple cannot share a single family dwelling? Or, how about 2 single moms who are friends, trying to save some money in financial hard times? Can they not share a single family residence? I think the issue here is WHO will be living in the home, not that fact that they share no relation..
|
|
jimmyv
|
|
|
01-15-09 8:29 AM
|
Russell residents should be ashamed of themselves. EVERYONE is equal.
|
|
utherjorge
|
|
|
01-15-09 7:50 AM
|
So, in essence, Bailey, the issue here is "the residents who live in it." So, some adults who need care for the rest of their lives due to their condition are the concern. Some developmentally disabled adults unable to exist on their own is the problem. Shameful. This does no harm to anyone, and would likely be tucked back so as not to be seen...and even if you did see it, it looks like a house, if done correctly. Shameful.
|
|
Bailey
|
|
|
01-15-09 5:45 AM
|
I think that if you check in to the Derrick back issues in Oil City, this same issue came up last year. Nursing students from the college campus were living in a single family dwelling in an R-1 neighborhood when they had to find a new place to go. Single family dwelling....to me thats ONE family. Not two individuals from two different families living together. Wether or not the building looks like a duplex or not should be the issue, but the residents who live in it. If you are going to go by the codes in place, go by them, don't "bend" them. Someone needs to research the Oil City situiation before this gets messy.
|






